Tit paj la
Sa a se yon Paragraf. Klike sou "Edit Tèks" oswa double klike sou bwat tèks la pou kòmanse modifye kontni an epi asire w ke ou ajoute nenpòt detay oswa enfòmasyon ki enpòtan ke ou vle pataje ak vizitè ou yo.
Reproductive Justice in North Carolina:
While North Carolina’s reproductive justice battles have largely played out in federal courts, these cases underscore the vital role our judiciary plays in shaping access to essential health care. Although originating in NC, these cases reflect the broader national fight for reproductive rights and the significant impact judicial decisions can have.
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic v. Stein
Status: Ongoing
Last Update: June 21, 2023
Although a federal case, this case arose in response to Senate Bill 20, which restricted abortion access after 12 weeks. The bill imposed harsh limitations, including requiring abortions after 12 weeks to be performed in hospitals, which the court blocked, recognizing the lack of medical justification. This ruling highlights how crucial it is to have judges who protect reproductive rights. Had our judiciary fully reflected NC's values from the start, these harmful restrictions might never have been implemented.
READ MORE
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic et al v. Moore et al
Status: Ongoing
Last Update: August 8, 2022
This federal case was brought by abortion providers and the SisterSong Women of Color Reproductive Justice Collective, challenging a series of restrictive abortion laws in North Carolina. These laws included biased counseling, mandatory delays, and a ban on telehealth for medication abortion. The case argued that these restrictions disproportionately affected Black and rural communities. A more aligned judiciary could have prevented these discriminatory laws from taking hold, ensuring equitable access to reproductive care across the state.
READ MORE
Peltier v. Charter Day School
Status: Closed
Last Update: August 9, 2021
Although this is a federal case based in North Carolina about gender discrimination in dress codes, it also touches on broader issues of bodily autonomy and the right to challenge oppressive policies. The U.S. Supreme Court let stand a ruling that struck down the school's "skirts-only" policy for girls, which was based on outdated and sexist stereotypes. The outcome of this case reinforces the need for judges who will uphold equal rights and reject policies that discriminate based on gender.
READ MORE
Lessons from Our Neighbors:
Reproductive Justice Battles
As we look beyond North Carolina, the experiences of our neighbors provide crucial lessons on the power of judicial elections in shaping reproductive justice. States like Kansas, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Florida, and Alabama have seen their Supreme Courts make decisions that either protect or restrict access to reproductive health care. These cases demonstrate how vital it is for voters to elect judges who align with their values. By learning from these states, North Carolinians can better understand the importance of judicial elections in safeguarding our reproductive rights.
PA Supreme Court Expands Reproductive Rights:
Medicaid Coverage for Abortions Secured
In Pennsylvania, the state Supreme Court recently ruled to allow Medicaid payments for abortions, marking a significant victory for reproductive rights advocates. This decision ensures that low-income individuals can access abortion services through Medicaid, expanding access to essential reproductive care. The ruling underscores the power of judicial decisions in protecting reproductive rights and highlights the importance of electing judges who support reproductive justice. This case serves as a crucial reminder of the role that state courts play in shaping access to health care.
These cases remind us that judicial elections are crucial. The judges we elect have the power to protect or restrict our rights. Your vote in judicial elections can prevent future injustices. Stay informed, vote down-ballot, and ensure our judges reflect North Carolina’s values.
FIND YOUR SAMPLE BALLOT HERE
